State Guide
Data Centers in Washington: Lawsuits, Disputes, and Your Rights
Washington's Quincy cluster in Grant County is one of the oldest hyperscale hubs in the country, and it produced early resident fights over diesel generator air permits in the 2010s. No current litigation is documented, but the legal options remain. How Washington neighbors can tell us about their situation.
Washington at a glance
Major market
- Market size
- Major; the Quincy cluster in Grant County is one of the country's longest established hyperscale hubs
- Hot spots
- Quincy and Grant County, the Seattle metro area
- Key operators
- Microsoft, plus legacy Yahoo era facilities and other operators drawn by cheap hydropower
- Documented disputes
- Historic challenges to diesel generator air permits in Quincy in the 2010s; nothing current documented as of August 2026
- Statewide action
- None documented as of August 2026
Key Takeaways
- Washington was hyperscale before hyperscale was a word: cheap Columbia River hydropower pulled Microsoft, Yahoo, and others to Quincy in Grant County years before the AI boom.
- The state also produced some of the earliest data center air fights in the country: Quincy residents challenged diesel backup generator permits in the 2010s, putting the industry's emissions on the legal map early.
- No data center lawsuit is currently pending in Washington as documented as of August 2026, which makes it unusual among major markets.
- The legal tools that worked elsewhere are all available here: nuisance claims, air permit appeals and comments, environmental review challenges, and local ordinance enforcement.
- If a facility near you is causing harm, the playbook from other states says start documenting now; deadlines on permit appeals are short and damage claims carry statutes of limitations.
Data centers in Washington, from the registry
All 55 sites55 sites on the public record: 42 operating, 4 under construction, 0 permitted, 7 proposed, 2 cancelled. 3 carry documented opposition or litigation. 3.2 GW planned.
By county, alphabetically. Each profile carries capacity, land, utility, water, subsidies, jobs, a timeline, and every source.
Benton County (3 sites)
- Atlas Agro Richland Data Center Campus · Richland · Atlas Agro North AmericaProposed · 320 MW · Supported
- PNNL AI Data Center · Richland · Battelle Memorial Institute (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)Proposed · 2 MW
- Trammell Crow Lewis & Clark Ranch Data Center · West Richland · Trammell Crow CompanyProposed
Chelan County (5 sites)
- Microsoft Malaga Campus · Malaga · MicrosoftUnder construction · 288 MW · Mixed reception
- Project Edith (former Soluna Wenatchee site) · Wenatchee · Soluna Computing, Inc.Cancelled · 3.3 MW
- Salcido Entiat Data Center · Entiat · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 2 MW
- Salcido Cashmere Data Center · Cashmere · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating
- Salcido Columbia Data Center · Wenatchee · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating
Douglas County (9 sites)
- Microsoft East Wenatchee Data Center · East Wenatchee · MicrosoftOperating · 180 MW
- Bitdeer Wenatchee (Pangborn) Data Center · East Wenatchee · BitdeerUnder construction · 13 MW
- Salcido Pangborn Data Center · East Wenatchee · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 10 MW
- Salcido ELLER Data Center · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 4 MW
- Actapio East Wenatchee Data Center · East Wenatchee · Actapio, Inc.Operating
- Giga Watt Mining Facility (former) · East Wenatchee · Giga Watt Inc.Cancelled
- Sabey Intergate.Columbia Building A · East Wenatchee · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.Columbia Building B · East Wenatchee · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.Columbia Building D · East Wenatchee · Sabey Data CentersUnder construction
Grant County (15 sites)
- CyrusOne PNW1 · Quincy · CyrusOneOperating · 90 MW
- Vantage Quincy WA11 · Quincy · Vantage Data CentersOperating · 89 MW
- Sabey Intergate.Quincy Campus · Quincy · Sabey Data CentersOperating · 70 MW
- Vantage WA13 · Quincy · Vantage Data CentersOperating · 64 MW
- H5 Data Centers Quincy Campus · Quincy · H5 Data CentersOperating · 40 MW
- TiTAN (Serverfarm Moses Lake) · Moses Lake · Serverfarm LLCOperating · 22 MW
- Moses Lake Facility · Moses Lake · Bitfarms Ltd. (Keel Infrastructure Corp.)Under construction · 18 MW
- Salcido Wheeler Data Center · Moses Lake · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 4.8 MW
- Salcido Fortress Data Center · Quincy · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 4.6 MW
- Salcido Horizon Data Center · Quincy · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 4 MW
- Salcido Broadway Data Center · Salcido Enterprises, LLCOperating · 2 MW
- Microsoft Columbia Data Center (Quincy) · Quincy · MicrosoftOperating
- Microsoft MWH Data Center · Quincy · Microsoft CorporationOperating
- NTT Data Quincy Data Center · Quincy · NTT DATAOperating
- Vantage WA12 · Quincy · Vantage Data CentersOperating
King County (12 sites)
- Digital Realty SEA1 (Intergate Seattle-East, Bldg 4) · Tukwila · Digital RealtyOperating
- Equinix Seattle SE3 · Seattle · EquinixOperating
- Equinix Seattle SE4 · Kent · EquinixOperating
- H5 Data Centers Seattle · Seattle · H5 Data CentersOperating
- KOMO Plaza (formerly Fisher Plaza) · Seattle · GI PartnersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.East Building 1 · Tukwila · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.East Building 3 · Tukwila · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.East Building 5 (SDC East 5) · Tukwila · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.West Building A · Tukwila · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.West Building B · Tukwila · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Sabey Intergate.West Building C · Tukwila · Sabey Data CentersOperating
- Westin Building (Digital Realty Seattle SEA10) · Seattle · Digital RealtyOperating
Kittitas County (1 site)
- Blue Fern Cle Elum Data Center · Cle Elum · Blue Fern DevelopmentProposed · 20 MW · Contested
Klickitat County (1 site)
- STACK Infrastructure Goldendale Data Center · Goldendale · STACK InfrastructureProposed · 958 MW · Opposed
Pend Oreille County (1 site)
- Merkle Standard Usk Facility · Usk · Merkle Standard (Allrise Capital)Operating · 100 MW · Mixed reception
Pierce County (1 site)
- Centeris South Hill Campus (SH1/SH2) · Puyallup · Centeris (The Benaroya Company)Operating · 50 MW
Snohomish County (2 sites)
- Digital Fortress Lynnwood (SEA1) · Lynnwood · Digital FortressOperating · 10 MW
- Centersquare Lynnwood SE1 · Lynnwood · CentersquareOperating
Spokane County (3 sites)
- Rock Point Data Center Project · West Plains · Apricus Energy PartnersProposed · 1 GW · Contested
- Lumen Spokane · Spokane · Lumen TechnologiesOperating
- TierPoint Spokane · Liberty Lake · TierPointOperating
Thurston County (1 site)
- Washington State Data Center (1500 Jefferson Building) · Olympia · Washington Technology SolutionsOperating
Walla Walla County (1 site)
- AWS Wallula Gap Campus · Wallula · Amazon Web ServicesProposed · 300 MW · Mixed reception
In this article
Washington is one of the oldest hyperscale data center markets in America and, right now, one of the quietest legally. Cheap hydropower from Columbia River dams drew Microsoft, Yahoo, and a cluster of operators to the small farm town of Quincy in Grant County starting in the mid 2000s, and the Seattle metro area carries its own facilities. Quincy also produced some of the industry's earliest neighbor fights: residents challenged air permits for the fleets of diesel backup generators in the 2010s. As of August 2026, no current data center litigation is documented in the state, but the density of facilities and the age of the Quincy cluster mean Washington neighbors should know exactly what their options are.
The data center footprint in Washington
Quincy is the story. A town of a few thousand people in Grant County became one of the country's most important data center hubs because the local public utility district sells some of the cheapest electricity in the nation, generated by Columbia River dams. Microsoft built early and kept building; Yahoo's legacy facilities and other operators filled in around them. The Seattle metro area hosts additional capacity closer to the region's tech employers.
The Quincy cluster's age matters. These campuses have operated next to homes, schools, and farms for well over a decade, which means Washington residents have longer experience living with the industry, including with the banks of diesel backup generators every large data center keeps on site, than neighbors in almost any other state.
What residents are dealing with
Washington's documented concerns have centered on air, with the familiar background issues alongside:
- Diesel generator emissions. Large data centers keep dozens of diesel backup generators that must be test-run regularly. In Quincy, the sheer number of permitted generators in a small town made emissions a community issue in the 2010s and drove residents to challenge permits.
- Noise and mechanical hum from cooling systems, the universal complaint near large campuses everywhere.
- Growth pressure as the industry expands in a town that remains, at heart, an agricultural community.
None of these has produced current litigation, but the concerns mirror the issues that have gone to court in other states. Our air pollution and noise pages cover what those harms look like and how they become claims.
Lawsuits and disputes in Washington
Honest answer first: no data center lawsuit is currently documented in Washington as of August 2026.
The state's legal history is still worth knowing. In the 2010s, Quincy residents challenged air permits for data center diesel backup generators, an early example of neighbors using the permit process to contest the industry's emissions. Those fights predate the AI boom, but they established the pattern that has since played out nationally: the permit file is where a community's leverage lives.
Elsewhere in the country, that pattern has escalated into major litigation: a Clean Air Act suit over unpermitted turbines in the xAI Memphis fight, a noise class action against Microsoft in Wisconsin, and rezoning challenges that voided approvals in Virginia. Washington residents facing similar harms would be drawing on a well developed national playbook.
Your legal options in Washington
Washington neighbors have the same core toolkit residents are using in other states:
- Nuisance and property claims. Constant noise, dust, or emissions that interfere with your home can support a private nuisance claim for damages and abatement, typically handled on contingency.
- Air permit comments and appeals. Generator and turbine permits go through public processes with comment periods and appeal rights, the route Quincy residents used in the 2010s. Appeal windows are short.
- Environmental review. Washington's state environmental review process gives residents a voice on significant new projects and a basis to challenge review that gets shortcut.
- Local ordinance enforcement on noise and code issues, which builds the record for any later claim.
Statutes of limitations apply to damage claims, commonly two to six years depending on the claim type; a Washington attorney can confirm the deadlines that govern your situation. See our guide on whether you can sue a data center for how these claims work in general.
If you live near a Washington data center
Start a record: a dated log of noise, odors, or generator testing, decibel readings at your property line, photos, and written complaints to the operator, the county, and the air agency every time. Pull the facility's permits and check the conditions; generator testing schedules and emission limits are enforceable, and violations documented in writing are leverage.
Then get a legal read on it. Our free intake form lets you tell us what is happening; where a participating attorney who handles these matters in Washington is available, we may share your information with them with your consent, but we cannot promise that anyone will contact you.
No Washington case yet. Here is what is happening nearby.
We have not documented a filed case in Washington. That does not mean a claim is not available to you. These cases come from states next door, where the same operators build and the same harms come up, and the two landmark outcomes below them are the results every neighbor should know about.
- SettledOregonAmazon's $20.5 Million Nitrate Settlement
Settled: $20.5 million, motion for preliminary approval filed March 31, 2026
- SettledOregonThe Dalles v. The Oregonian
Settled December 14, 2022, Wasco County Circuit Court
- SettledMichigan· Landmark caseSaline Township v. the $7 Billion Data Center
Settled; project proceeding with community benefits package
- Plaintiff winOhio· Landmark caseAshville, Ohio Put a Data Center Deal on the Ballot. The Ohio Supreme Court Made It Possible by Reading One Paragraph.
Peremptory writ granted for relators, Ohio Supreme Court, August 7, 2026; referendum reported set for the November 3, 2026 ballot
Your rights do not depend on whether someone in Washington has sued yet. Start with whether you can sue a data center, then what to document now, because the evidence you gather today is what a lawyer will ask for whenever you act.
Frequently asked questions
Can I sue a data center in Washington?
Yes, the legal tools exist even though no data center suit is currently documented in the state. Washington residents can bring nuisance and property damage claims, appeal air permits, and challenge inadequate environmental review, the same theories neighbors are using in pending cases in Wisconsin, Texas, and Virginia.
Has anyone sued over data centers in Quincy?
Quincy produced early air fights rather than damage suits: residents challenged diesel backup generator permits in the 2010s as the cluster grew. As of August 2026 no current data center litigation is documented in Washington, but the permit process remains the main venue where Quincy residents have historically pushed back.
What can I do about data center diesel generators near me in Washington?
Generator emissions and testing are governed by air permits with enforceable conditions. Get the facility's permit, document testing noise and smoke with dates, and file written complaints with the air agency. Permit renewals and expansion applications include public comment periods, which is where residents have the most leverage.
What can I do about data center noise in Washington?
Document it with dated logs and decibel readings at your property line, and file written complaints with your city or county. A documented record supports ordinance enforcement now and a nuisance claim later if the problem continues. Neighbors in other states have won mitigation this way without ever filing suit.
Will data centers raise my electric bill in Washington?
Washington's dynamics differ from most states because public utility districts with cheap hydropower serve the biggest clusters. No rate litigation or data center rate class is documented in the state as of August 2026, but cost allocation for large loads is an active national issue worth watching at your local utility district.
Is a data center disrupting your home in Washington?
Tell us what is happening. Where a participating attorney who handles data center cases in your state is available, we may share your information with them with your consent. It is free and carries no obligation, but we cannot promise that anyone will contact you.
- Tell us about your situation
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us