Data Center Registry
Beltline Energy Piedmont Site
Piedmont, Kingfisher County, Oklahoma · All 3 Beltline Energy sites
Beltline Energy Piedmont Site is a proposed data center in Piedmont, Oklahoma (Kingfisher County), operated by Beltline Energy. The public record puts it at 321 acres. It is the subject of active public debate, with hearings, petitions, or organized opposition on record.
Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.
Facility record
Proposed
- Operator
- Beltline Energy
- Facility type
- Data center
- Location
- Piedmont, Kingfisher County, OK
- Coordinates
- 35.7439, -97.8118 (approximate)
- Power capacity
- Not established from a public source
- Land
- 321 acres
- Investment
- Not established from a public source
- Announced
- Not established from a public source
- Utility
- Not established from a public source
- Cooling
- Not established from a public source
- Water use
- Not established from a public source
- Jobs
- Not established from a public source
- Public subsidy
- Not established from a public source
- Community reception
- Contested
- Source confidence
- Reported by at least one credible outlet or filing
Opposition and litigation at this site
Yes. Beltline Energy Piedmont Site in Piedmont, Kingfisher County, Oklahoma is contested. Hearings, public comment, petitions, or organized opposition are on record, and no lawsuit has been filed so far. Residents packed Piedmont's Planning Commission meeting over competing data-center proposals; the BLE Landholdings/Beltline vote was deferred (June 1, 2026) for further comprehensive-plan review, the same night a sibling proposal (Cloverleaf) was recommended for denial.
How the community has taken it
Reception is a sourced signal, not an editorial judgment: contested means active public debate is on record, with hearings, petitions, or organized opposition, without litigation.
Residents packed Piedmont's Planning Commission meeting over competing data-center proposals; the BLE Landholdings/Beltline vote was deferred (June 1, 2026) for further comprehensive-plan review, the same night a sibling proposal (Cloverleaf) was recommended for denial.
Notes on the record
321-acre rezoning filed via BLE Holdings LLC / BLE Landholdings LLC, SW/4 of Section 26, Township 15N, Range 6W, Kingfisher County, legal descriptions and Kingfisher County parcel numbers 0000-26-15N-06W-3-000-00, -3-001-00, -3-002-00, -3-003-00 (plus an adjacent 5th parcel, -4-000-00) per the city's own PUD filing. Bounded by E 870 Rd (N), N 2920 Rd (E), Azalea St NW (S), N 2910 Rd (W). City vote delayed for further review as of source date. This is a distinct, separate, competing site from Cloverleaf's 630-acre 'Project Open Sky' proposal also in Piedmont (different parcels, different developer, different acreage), despite sharing a host city, do not conflate the two (both independently confirmed as separate projects via direct source verification). No primary-sourced capacity or investment figure was found for this specific site, omitted rather than guessed.
What the record does not establish, and the document that would
In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.
- Power capacity in megawatts
- Cooling method and water use
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- Permanent jobs promised
- Which utility serves it
Which document closes each gap
- Power capacity in megawatts
- The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
- Cooling method and water use
- The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
- Permanent jobs promised
- The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
- Which utility serves it
- The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.
Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.
Other sites within 30 miles
Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.
- Cloverleaf Project Open Sky · Piedmont · Cloverleaf Infrastructure3 mi · Proposed · 1.5 GW · Contested
- MIDCON Recovery Solutions Data Center · Oklahoma City · MIDCON Recovery Solutions16 mi · Operating
- Beltline Energy Oklahoma City Campus · Oklahoma City · Beltline Energy18 mi · Proposed · Supported
- American Tower EDC Oklahoma (Oklahoma City) · Oklahoma City · American Tower21 mi · Proposed · 4 MW
- Windstream Wholesale Oklahoma City Data Center · Oklahoma City · Windstream25 mi · Operating
- Cerebras Oklahoma City Data Center · Oklahoma City · Cerebras Systems25 mi · Operating · 10 MW · Supported
- CloudBurst Oklahoma City Campus · Oklahoma City · CloudBurst Data Centers25 mi · Proposed · 200 MW
- Cogent Oklahoma City Data Center · Oklahoma City · Cogent Communications25 mi · Operating
Questions people ask about this site
Is there opposition to the Beltline Energy Piedmont Site data center in Piedmont?
Yes. Beltline Energy Piedmont Site in Piedmont, Kingfisher County, Oklahoma is contested. Hearings, public comment, petitions, or organized opposition are on record, and no lawsuit has been filed so far. Residents packed Piedmont's Planning Commission meeting over competing data-center proposals; the BLE Landholdings/Beltline vote was deferred (June 1, 2026) for further comprehensive-plan review, the same night a sibling proposal (Cloverleaf) was recommended for denial.
Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Beltline Energy Piedmont Site data center?
No lawsuit over Beltline Energy Piedmont Site appears in the record we track as of July 26, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.
How much water does Beltline Energy Piedmont Site use?
No water withdrawal figure for Beltline Energy Piedmont Site is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.
Who operates Beltline Energy Piedmont Site, and how big is it?
Beltline Energy is the operator on record. We hold 3 sites for that company across the registry. No capacity figure is on record for this site. The site is recorded at 321 acres.
How to cite this page
SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Beltline Energy Piedmont Site," updated July 26, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/beltline-piedmont-kingfisher-county-ok.
Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/beltline-piedmont-kingfisher-county-ok, retrieved September 14, 2026.
Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Sources for this record
As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.
- 1.Data Center Transparency Portal · City of Piedmont, OK · retrieved July 11, 2026
- 2.Commission urges council to deny Cloverleaf plan; Beltline Energy vote delayed for review · OKCFOX · retrieved July 11, 2026
Is a data center disrupting your home?
Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.
- Free case review
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us