Data Center Registry

Beltline Energy Piedmont Site

Piedmont, Kingfisher County, Oklahoma · All 4 Beltline Energy sites

ProposedContestedRecord updated October 28, 2026

Beltline Energy Piedmont Site is a proposed data center in Piedmont, Oklahoma (Kingfisher County), operated by Beltline Energy. The public record puts it at 321 acres. It is the subject of active public debate, with hearings, petitions, or organized opposition on record.

Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.

Facility record

Proposed

Operator: Beltline Energy
Facility type: Data center
Location: Piedmont, Kingfisher County, OK
Coordinates: 35.7439, -97.8118 (approximate)
Power capacity: Not established from a public source
Land: 321 acres
Investment: Not established from a public source
Announced: Not established from a public source
Utility: Not established from a public source
Cooling: Not established from a public source
Water use: Not established from a public source
Jobs: Not established from a public source
Public subsidy: Not established from a public source
Community reception: Contested
Source confidence: Reported by at least one credible outlet or filing

Opposition and litigation at this site

Yes. Beltline Energy Piedmont Site in Piedmont, Kingfisher County, Oklahoma is contested. Hearings, public comment, petitions, or organized opposition are on record, and no lawsuit has been filed so far. Residents packed Piedmont's Planning Commission meeting over competing data-center proposals; the BLE Landholdings/Beltline vote was deferred (June 1, 2026) for further comprehensive-plan review, the same night a sibling proposal (Cloverleaf) was recommended for denial.

How the community has taken it

Reception is a sourced signal, not an editorial judgment: contested means active public debate is on record, with hearings, petitions, or organized opposition, without litigation.

Residents packed Piedmont's Planning Commission meeting over competing data-center proposals; the BLE Landholdings/Beltline vote was deferred (June 1, 2026) for further comprehensive-plan review, the same night a sibling proposal (Cloverleaf) was recommended for denial. In early October 2026 the commission voted to send Beltline's master design plan to the City Council, recommending that the council take no action until outstanding issues (additional studies, landscaping and setback requirements, stronger compliance provisions) are addressed; the vote does not amount to final approval, and the project would return to the commission for a separate rezoning hearing.

Source: OKCFOX

Notes on the record

321-acre rezoning filed via BLE Holdings LLC / BLE Landholdings LLC, SW/4 of Section 26, Township 15N, Range 6W, Kingfisher County, legal descriptions and Kingfisher County parcel numbers 0000-26-15N-06W-3-000-00, -3-001-00, -3-002-00, -3-003-00 (plus an adjacent 5th parcel, -4-000-00) per the city's own PUD filing. Bounded by E 870 Rd (N), N 2920 Rd (E), Azalea St NW (S), N 2910 Rd (W). The Planning Commission deferred the vote on June 1, 2026, and in early October 2026 sent the master design plan to the City Council without approving it; no final decision was found as of October 2026. This is a distinct, separate, competing site from Cloverleaf's 630-acre 'Project Open Sky' proposal also in Piedmont (different parcels, different developer, different acreage), despite sharing a host city, do not conflate the two (both independently confirmed as separate projects via direct source verification). As of July 2026, no primary-sourced capacity or investment figure was found for this specific site, omitted rather than guessed.

What the record does not establish, and the document that would

In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.

Power capacity in megawatts
Cooling method and water use
Tax abatements or other public subsidy
Permanent jobs promised
Which utility serves it

Which document closes each gap

Power capacity in megawatts: The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
Cooling method and water use: The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
Tax abatements or other public subsidy: The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
Permanent jobs promised: The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
Which utility serves it: The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.

Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.

Other sites within 30 miles

Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.

Cloverleaf Project Open Sky · Piedmont · Cloverleaf Infrastructure3 mi · Proposed · Contested
Paycom Headquarters Data Centers (Oklahoma City) · Oklahoma City · Paycom Software, Inc.13 mi · Operating
MIDCON Recovery Solutions Data Center · Oklahoma City · MIDCON Recovery Solutions16 mi · Operating
Beltline Energy Oklahoma City Campus · Oklahoma City · Beltline Energy18 mi · Proposed · 1 GW · Supported
Athlon BT El Reno Bitcoin Mining Site · El Reno · Athlon Blockchain LLC (Athlon BT)20 mi · Operating
LM Funding (Power & Compute) Calumet Bitcoin Mining Site · Calumet · LM Funding America, Inc. (Power & Compute)20 mi · Operating · 15 MW
American Tower EDC Oklahoma (Oklahoma City) · Oklahoma City · American Tower21 mi · Proposed · 4 MW
Windstream Wholesale Oklahoma City Data Center · Oklahoma City · Windstream25 mi · Operating

Tell us about your situation

Living near Beltline Energy Piedmont Site?

Tell us the basics. Where a participating attorney in your state is available, we may share your information with them with your consent. Free, no obligation, and no guarantee anyone will contact you.

By checking this box and submitting this form, I provide my electronic signature and my express written consent to receive calls and text messages about my potential claim from SueDataCenters.org (Theory Road LLC) and, where one is available for my situation, a participating attorney or law firm or their agents at the phone number I provided, including calls and texts made using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice, even if my number is on a federal, state, or company Do Not Call list. My consent is not a condition of submitting this form or of purchasing any goods or services. Message frequency varies, message and data rates may apply, and I can reply STOP to opt out or HELP for help at any time. I agree to the Privacy Policy and Advertising Disclosure and understand my information may be shared with a participating attorney, and with the other parties described there, as those documents explain. Submitting does not create an attorney-client relationship, and no one is guaranteed to contact me. See our Privacy Policy and Advertising Disclosure.

Questions people ask about this site

Is there opposition to the Beltline Energy Piedmont Site data center in Piedmont?

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Beltline Energy Piedmont Site data center?

No lawsuit over Beltline Energy Piedmont Site appears in the record we track as of October 28, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.

How much water does Beltline Energy Piedmont Site use?

No water withdrawal figure for Beltline Energy Piedmont Site is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.

Who operates Beltline Energy Piedmont Site, and how big is it?

Beltline Energy is the operator on record. We hold 4 sites for that company across the registry. No capacity figure is on record for this site. The site is recorded at 321 acres.

How to cite this page

SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Beltline Energy Piedmont Site," updated October 28, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/beltline-piedmont-kingfisher-county-ok.

Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.34.1 (October 4, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/beltline-piedmont-kingfisher-county-ok, retrieved October 29, 2026.

Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Sources for this record

As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.

1.Data Center Transparency Portal · City of Piedmont, OK · retrieved July 11, 2026
2.Commission urges council to deny Cloverleaf plan; Beltline Energy vote delayed for review · OKCFOX · retrieved September 14, 2026
3.Piedmont planning commission advances Beltline data center plan · OKCFOX (KOKH) · retrieved October 28, 2026
4.Piedmont Planning Commission advances proposed data center rezoning · News9 · retrieved October 28, 2026

Is a data center disrupting your home?

Tell us what is happening. Where a participating attorney who handles data center cases in your state is available, we may share your information with them with your consent. It is free and carries no obligation, but we cannot promise that anyone will contact you.

Tell us about your situation
|
Independent attorneys
|
No obligation

Tell us about your situation Do I even have a case?

Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us