Data Center Registry
Grand Crossing South - Building 10
City of Industry, Los Angeles County, California · All 3 Raeden sites
Grand Crossing South - Building 10 is a proposed data center in City of Industry, California (Los Angeles County), operated by Raeden.
Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.
Facility record
Proposed
- Operator
- Raeden
- Facility type
- Data center, AI use likely
- Location
- 110 Marcellin Drive, City of Industry, Los Angeles County, CA, 91789
- Coordinates
- 34.0051, -117.8333 (approximate)
- Power capacity
- Not established from a public source
- Land
- Not established from a public source
- Investment
- Not established from a public source
- Announced
- Not established from a public source
- Utility
- Not established from a public source
- Cooling
- Not established from a public source
- Water use
- Not established from a public source
- Jobs
- Not established from a public source
- Public subsidy
- Not established from a public source
- Community reception
- No reception on record
- Source confidence
- Reported by at least one credible outlet or filing
Opposition and litigation at this site
The record carries no reception finding for Grand Crossing South - Building 10 in City of Industry, Los Angeles County, California, but it does carry this note as of August 2, 2026: Organized, citywide opposition to City of Industry data-center development exists (an 18,000-signature 'No Data Centers SGV Coalition' petition per LA TACO, and a separate Action Network petition titled 'No Data Centers in City of Industry!'), but no source names Raeden or this specific building as the target of that opposition - the opposition is citywide/policy-level, not project-specific.
Notes on the record
December 2025: Raeden Inc. proposed leasing 'Building 10' (110 Marcellin Drive) within Majestic Realty's 290-acre Grand Crossing South business park for a data center, requesting up to 30 MVA (an apparent-power unit, not converted to a MW figure since no source discloses one). No lease is confirmed executed; City of Industry directed consultants to plan the site as a future data center 'whether with Raeden or another tenant.' aiClassification set to 'likely' on the strength of Raeden's company-wide AI/HPC/neocloud-focused business model (150kW+/rack, liquid cooling, GPU-cloud tenants), though no site-specific tenant or spec has been disclosed yet. Investment/acreage/jobs not disclosed for this specific building (Grand Crossing South's 290 acres covers the whole multi-building park, not this parcel alone) and are omitted. ZIP 91789 spans both City of Industry and Diamond Bar - jurisdiction resolved to City of Industry via the city government body actively considering this project, not postal city alone; recommend parcel/APN-level confirmation in a future pass. Distinct from the unrelated Puente Hills Mall/MARICI battery-storage project in the same city (rezoned for battery storage, not a data center, in Feb 2026). Coordinates are an approximate representative point within the Grand Crossing master-planned development (the specific private road 'Marcellin Drive' is not indexed in OpenStreetMap), not a parcel-confirmed point. Proposed tenant; developer: Majestic Realty.
What the record does not establish, and the document that would
In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.
- Power capacity in megawatts
- Cooling method and water use
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- Permanent jobs promised
- Land area
- How the community has received it
- Which utility serves it
Which document closes each gap
- Power capacity in megawatts
- The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
- Cooling method and water use
- The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
- Permanent jobs promised
- The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
- Land area
- The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.
- How the community has received it
- Planning commission and governing body minutes, public comment records, and any petition or lawsuit filed in the county.
- Which utility serves it
- The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.
Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.
Other sites within 30 miles
Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.
- DigiCo LAX1 (1977 Saturn Street) · Monterey Park · DigiCo Infrastructure REIT16 mi · Cancelled · Opposed
- Centersquare LAX3 · Irvine · Centersquare (Cyxtera/Evoque)22 mi · Operating · 24.9 MW
- Vernon LA Campus (with Goodman Group) · Vernon · DataBank22 mi · Proposed · 32 MW
- Centersquare LAX5 · Irvine · Centersquare (Cyxtera/Evoque)22 mi · Operating · 17.3 MW
- Digital Realty Vernon Data Center · Vernon · Digital Realty22 mi · Proposed · 32 MW
- Prime Data Centers LAX01 · Vernon · Prime Data Centers23 mi · Operating · 33 MW
- CoreSite LA2 - Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles · CoreSite23 mi · Operating
- CoreSite LA1 (One Wilshire) · Los Angeles · CoreSite24 mi · Operating
Questions people ask about this site
Is there opposition to the Grand Crossing South - Building 10 data center in City of Industry?
The record carries no reception finding for Grand Crossing South - Building 10 in City of Industry, Los Angeles County, California, but it does carry this note as of August 2, 2026: Organized, citywide opposition to City of Industry data-center development exists (an 18,000-signature 'No Data Centers SGV Coalition' petition per LA TACO, and a separate Action Network petition titled 'No Data Centers in City of Industry!'), but no source names Raeden or this specific building as the target of that opposition - the opposition is citywide/policy-level, not project-specific.
Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Grand Crossing South - Building 10 data center?
No lawsuit over Grand Crossing South - Building 10 appears in the record we track as of August 2, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.
How much water does Grand Crossing South - Building 10 use?
No water withdrawal figure for Grand Crossing South - Building 10 is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.
Who operates Grand Crossing South - Building 10, and how big is it?
Raeden is the operator on record. We hold 3 sites for that company across the registry. No capacity figure is on record for this site.
How to cite this page
SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Grand Crossing South - Building 10," updated August 2, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/raeden-grand-crossing-south-city-of-industry-ca.
Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/raeden-grand-crossing-south-city-of-industry-ca, retrieved September 14, 2026.
Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Sources for this record
As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.
- 1.City of Industry discussed data center sites months before zoning vote · Investigate LA · retrieved August 2, 2026
- 2.Nobody is really paying attention: City of Industry zoning and energy moves raise data center concerns · Investigate LA · retrieved August 2, 2026
- 3.How to Stop A Data Center in Your Backyard · L.A. TACO · retrieved August 2, 2026
- 4.Grand Crossing South project page · Majestic Realty Co. · retrieved August 2, 2026
- 5.Raeden data centers overview · Raeden Inc. · retrieved August 2, 2026
Is a data center disrupting your home?
Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.
- Free case review
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us