Data Center Registry

Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn)

Oakley, Contra Costa County, California

CancelledOpposedRecord updated September 21, 2026

Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn) is a cancelled data center in Oakley, California (Contra Costa County), operated by JB2 Partners / Oxfoot Oakley LLC. The public record puts it at announced May 2024. It faces documented, organized local opposition.

Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.

Facility record

Cancelled

Operator: JB2 Partners / Oxfoot Oakley LLC
Facility type: Data center
Location: 3231 Main Street, Oakley, Contra Costa County, CA, 94561
Coordinates: 38.0062, -121.7391
Power capacity: Not established from a public source
Land: Not established from a public source
Investment: Not established from a public source
Announced: May 2024
Utility: Not established from a public source
Cooling: Not established from a public source
Water use: Not established from a public source
Jobs: Not established from a public source
Public subsidy: Not established from a public source
Community reception: Opposed
Source confidence: Confirmed by multiple independent sources or official documentation

Timeline from the record

Newest first. Record entries come from the filings and reports the registry cites. Coverage entries are headlines from publisher feeds we monitor daily, linked to the outlet; last checked September 14, 2026.

March 10, 2026
Cancelled
Applicant formally removed data centers from the PUD and application 'in its entirety' during the 2026-03-10 council hearing after community opposition; the industrial project was approved 4 to 1 without them, and Oakley adopted a data center moratorium in April 2026. Source: KQED
May 2024
Proposed
Bridgehead Industrial Project (164 acres, 10 light-industrial buildings, 3.18M sq ft) included data centers as a permitted use in its PUD application. Source: California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (CEQAnet)

Opposition and litigation at this site

Yes. Organized local opposition to Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn) in Oakley, Contra Costa County, California is documented in the public record, without a lawsuit on file in the sources we track. Resident pushback over water and electricity demand drove the withdrawal; Oakley became the first Bay Area city to enact a data center moratorium (through April 2027).

How the community has taken it

Reception is a sourced signal, not an editorial judgment: opposed means documented, organized local opposition is the dominant signal on record.

Resident pushback over water and electricity demand drove the withdrawal; Oakley became the first Bay Area city to enact a data center moratorium (through April 2027).

Source: KQED

Notes on the record

Only the data center use was withdrawn; the approved 164-acre logistics project (warehousing, truck parking, battery storage) proceeds. No data center capacity was ever specified. Coordinates from the CEQAnet filing (38°0'22.4"N 121°44'20.9"W).

What the record does not establish, and the document that would

In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.

Power capacity in megawatts
Cooling method and water use
Tax abatements or other public subsidy
Permanent jobs promised
Land area
Which utility serves it

Which document closes each gap

Power capacity in megawatts: The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
Cooling method and water use: The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
Tax abatements or other public subsidy: The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
Permanent jobs promised: The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
Land area: The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.
Which utility serves it: The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.

Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.

Other sites within 30 miles

Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.

AVAIO Digital Perseus · Pittsburg · AVAIO Digital Partners9 mi · Permitted · 99 MW · Contested
Nautilus Stockton 1 Data Center · Stockton · Nautilus Data Technologies20 mi · Operating · 6.5 MW
NorthPoint Fairfield Data Center (Vanden Road Industrial Campus) · Fairfield · NorthPoint Development23 mi · Proposed · 150 MW
Solano County Fairgrounds Data Center (Global Stack proposal) · Vallejo · Global Stack LLC28 mi · Proposed · Contested

Free case review

Living near Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn)?

Tell us the basics and an independent attorney handling data center cases in your state will follow up. Free, and you are never obligated to hire anyone.

By checking this box and submitting this form, I provide my electronic signature and my express written consent to receive calls and text messages about my potential claim from SueDataCenters.org and one or more participating law firms or their agents at the phone number I provided, including calls and texts made using an automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice, even if my number is on a federal, state, or company Do Not Call list. My consent is not a condition of receiving a case review or of purchasing any goods or services. Message frequency varies, message and data rates may apply, and I can reply STOP to opt out or HELP for help at any time. I agree to the Privacy Policy and Advertising Disclosure and understand my information may be shared with or sold to the parties described there. See our Privacy Policy and Advertising Disclosure.

Questions people ask about this site

Is there opposition to the Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn) in Oakley?

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn)?

No lawsuit over Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn) appears in the record we track as of September 21, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.

How much water does Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn) use?

No water withdrawal figure for Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn) is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.

Who operates Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn), and how big is it?

JB2 Partners / Oxfoot Oakley LLC is the operator on record. No capacity figure is on record for this site.

How to cite this page

SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Bridgehead Industrial Project data center option (withdrawn)," updated September 21, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/bridgehead-industrial-oakley-data-center-ca.

Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.34.0 (September 21, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/bridgehead-industrial-oakley-data-center-ca, retrieved October 1, 2026.

Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Sources for this record

As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.

1.Oakley drops data center plans, approves massive industrial project (2026-03-11) · KQED · retrieved September 21, 2026
2.CEQAnet SCH 2024050471, Bridgehead Industrial Project, Notice of Determination (approved 2026-03-10), 3231 Main Street, Oakley · California Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (CEQAnet) · retrieved September 21, 2026

Is a data center disrupting your home?

Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.

Free case review
|
Independent attorneys
|
No obligation

Get my free case review Do I even have a case?

Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us