Data Center Registry
SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna)
Ravenna, Portage County, Ohio
SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) is a proposed data center in Ravenna, Ohio (Portage County), operated by Ray Harner (landowner-developer). It faces documented, organized local opposition.
Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.
Facility record
Proposed
- Operator
- Ray Harner (landowner-developer)
- Facility type
- Data center
- Location
- Ravenna, Portage County, OH
- Coordinates
- 41.1576, -81.2420 (approximate)
- Power capacity
- Not established from a public source
- Land
- Not established from a public source
- Investment
- Not established from a public source
- Announced
- Not established from a public source
- Utility
- Not established from a public source
- Cooling
- Not established from a public source
- Water use
- Not established from a public source
- Jobs
- Not established from a public source
- Public subsidy
- Not established from a public source
- Community reception
- Opposed
- Source confidence
- Reported by at least one credible outlet or filing
Timeline from the record
Newest first. Record entries come from the filings and reports the registry cites. Coverage entries are headlines from publisher feeds we monitor daily, linked to the outlet; last checked September 14, 2026.
- April 20, 2026ProposedRavenna City Council adopted a one-year citywide moratorium on data center construction in response to the proposal. Source: Ohio Data Centers (stopohiodatacenters.org)
Opposition and litigation at this site
Yes. Organized local opposition to SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) in Ravenna, Portage County, Ohio is documented in the public record, without a lawsuit on file in the sources we track. Ravenna City Council's planning committee moved to impose a one-year citywide data center moratorium after public opposition; the moratorium was adopted April 20, 2026.
How the community has taken it
Reception is a sourced signal, not an editorial judgment: opposed means documented, organized local opposition is the dominant signal on record.
Ravenna City Council's planning committee moved to impose a one-year citywide data center moratorium after public opposition; the moratorium was adopted April 20, 2026.
Notes on the record
Proposed on a State Route 14 parcel directly across from UH Portage Medical Center in Ravenna. Acreage, capacity and end user have not been made public; the landowner declined to comment. Distinct from Bitdeer's Shalersville Township campus elsewhere in Portage County.
What the record does not establish, and the document that would
In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.
- Power capacity in megawatts
- Cooling method and water use
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- Permanent jobs promised
- Land area
- Which utility serves it
Which document closes each gap
- Power capacity in megawatts
- The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
- Cooling method and water use
- The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
- Permanent jobs promised
- The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
- Land area
- The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.
- Which utility serves it
- The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.
Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.
Other sites within 30 miles
Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.
- Bitdeer Shalersville Data Center Campus · Shalersville Township · Bitdeer3 mi · Proposed · 750 MW · Contested
- BIT Mining / Viking Data Centers, Akron · Akron · BIT Mining / Viking Data Centers14 mi · Operating · 150 MW
- Lumen Akron 2 · Akron · Lumen Technologies14 mi · Operating · 3 MW
- Cogent Data Center Akron · Akron · Cogent Communications15 mi · Operating · 5 MW
- Ark Data Centers Akron II (fka Involta) · Akron · Ark Data Centers (formerly Involta)16 mi · Operating · 1 MW
- Ark Data Centers Akron I (fka Involta) · Akron · Ark Data Centers (formerly Involta)16 mi · Operating · 1 MW
- Bristolville 25 · Lordstown · Bristolville 25 Developer LLC / BHGH Properties19 mi · Proposed · In litigation
- Stargate Lordstown Campus · Lordstown · OpenAI / SoftBank / Oracle20 mi · Under construction · 1.5 GW · Supported
Questions people ask about this site
Is there opposition to the SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) in Ravenna?
Yes. Organized local opposition to SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) in Ravenna, Portage County, Ohio is documented in the public record, without a lawsuit on file in the sources we track. Ravenna City Council's planning committee moved to impose a one-year citywide data center moratorium after public opposition; the moratorium was adopted April 20, 2026.
Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna)?
No lawsuit over SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) appears in the record we track as of September 9, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.
How much water does SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) use?
No water withdrawal figure for SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna) is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.
Who operates SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna), and how big is it?
Ray Harner (landowner-developer) is the operator on record. No capacity figure is on record for this site.
How to cite this page
SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "SR-14 Data Center Proposal (Ravenna)," updated September 9, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/harner-sr-14-ravenna-portage-oh.
Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/harner-sr-14-ravenna-portage-oh, retrieved September 14, 2026.
Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Sources for this record
As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.
- 1.Ravenna City Council rushes to block potential data center proposal · The Portager · retrieved September 9, 2026
- 2.Data Center Near My Home in Ohio? Find Out for Your County, Portage County entry · Ohio Data Centers (stopohiodatacenters.org) · retrieved September 9, 2026
Is a data center disrupting your home?
Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.
- Free case review
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us