Sue Data Centers

Data Center Registry

Project Dazzler

Franklin Furnace, Scioto County, Ohio · All 53 Google sites · Every Google case on our tracker

PermittedIn litigationRecord updated July 26, 2026

Project Dazzler is a permitted data center in Franklin Furnace, Ohio (Scioto County), operated by Google. The public record puts it at 792 acres, a reported $1 billion investment. It is or has been the subject of litigation over its siting, permitting, or operation.

Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.

Facility record

Permitted

Operator
Google
Facility type
Data center
Location
Franklin Furnace, Scioto County, OH
Coordinates
38.6800, -82.7200 (approximate)
Power capacity
Not established from a public source
Land
792 acres
Investment
$1 billion
Announced
Not established from a public source
Utility
AEP Ohio
Cooling
Not established from a public source
Water use
Not established from a public source
Jobs
Not established from a public source
Public subsidy
Not established from a public source
Community reception
In litigation
Source confidence
Confirmed by multiple independent sources or official documentation

Timeline from the record

Newest first. Record entries come from the filings and reports the registry cites. Coverage entries are headlines from publisher feeds we monitor daily, linked to the outlet; last checked September 14, 2026.

  1. March 6, 2026
    Permitted
    792-acre site east of the Ohio River; Ohio EPA wetlands permit administratively complete March 2026; 500,000 sq ft phase 1, up to 1.7M sq ft total. Source: Data Center Dynamics

Opposition and litigation at this site

Yes. Project Dazzler in Franklin Furnace, Scioto County, Ohio is or has been the subject of litigation over its siting, permitting, or operation. A Scioto County resident sued the county commissioners in Common Pleas Court alleging Ohio Open Meetings Act violations (closed executive sessions) in negotiating the Community Reinvestment Area tax agreement tied to the Google project; the suit followed documented resident pushback at a township meeting.

How the community has taken it

Reception is a sourced signal, not an editorial judgment: in litigation means the facility is or has been the subject of a lawsuit related to its siting, permitting, or operation.

A Scioto County resident sued the county commissioners in Common Pleas Court alleging Ohio Open Meetings Act violations (closed executive sessions) in negotiating the Community Reinvestment Area tax agreement tied to the Google project; the suit followed documented resident pushback at a township meeting.

Source

Notes on the record

792-acre site in Green Township, east of the Ohio River. 500,000 sq ft phase 1, up to 1.7M sq ft total. Ohio EPA wetlands permit ('Project Dazzler') administratively complete March 2026; 75%/15-year tax abatement. Distinct from other tracked Google Ohio sites (Lancaster, Project BOSC-Lima, New Albany).

What the record does not establish, and the document that would

In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.

  • Power capacity in megawatts
  • Cooling method and water use
  • Tax abatements or other public subsidy
  • Permanent jobs promised
Which document closes each gap
Power capacity in megawatts
The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
Cooling method and water use
The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
Tax abatements or other public subsidy
The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
Permanent jobs promised
The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.

Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.

Other sites within 30 miles

Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.

Questions people ask about this site

Is there opposition to the Project Dazzler data center in Franklin Furnace?

Yes. Project Dazzler in Franklin Furnace, Scioto County, Ohio is or has been the subject of litigation over its siting, permitting, or operation. A Scioto County resident sued the county commissioners in Common Pleas Court alleging Ohio Open Meetings Act violations (closed executive sessions) in negotiating the Community Reinvestment Area tax agreement tied to the Google project; the suit followed documented resident pushback at a township meeting.

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Project Dazzler data center?

Yes. This site is recorded as being in litigation. The case, the court, and the filings we hold are listed on this page under the timeline and the sources.

How much water does Project Dazzler use?

No water withdrawal figure for Project Dazzler is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.

Who operates Project Dazzler, and how big is it?

Google is the operator on record. We hold 53 sites for that company across the registry. No capacity figure is on record for this site. The site is recorded at 792 acres.

How to cite this page

SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Project Dazzler," updated July 26, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/google-project-dazzler-franklin-furnace-oh.

Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/google-project-dazzler-franklin-furnace-oh, retrieved September 14, 2026.

Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Sources for this record

As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.

  1. 1.Google confirmed as company behind 500,000 sq ft data center in Scioto County, Ohio · Data Center Dynamics · retrieved July 17, 2026
  2. 2.Scioto County data center moves closer to construction as key environmental permit clears state review · Scioto Valley Guardian · retrieved July 17, 2026
  3. 3.HIFLD Electric Retail Service Territories (ORNL/DOE-CESER, 2023-08 vintage) · Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) / HIFLD · retrieved July 23, 2026
  4. 4.Scioto County Daily News, "Commissioners Respond to Open Meetings Lawsuit Over Data Center" · retrieved July 26, 2026

Is a data center disrupting your home?

Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.

  • Free case review
  • Independent attorneys
  • No obligation

Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us