Lawsuit Tracker
Cass County, Nebraska Paused Data Centers and a Village Banned Them Outright. No Lawsuit Was Filed, and That Is the Point.
After Tenaska optioned 1,354 acres in Cass County for a proposed natural gas plant and data center tied to Google, the county commissioners voted 5 to 0 on August 11, 2026 for a twelve month moratorium and the village of Nehawka banned data centers in every zoning district on August 26. No suit has been filed. Here is how residents did it and what Nebraska law gives the next community.
Case facts
Dispute, no suit filed
- Status
- No lawsuit filed; county moratorium adopted 5 to 0 on August 11, 2026, village ban adopted August 26, 2026
- Dispute
- Cass County residents, organized as Cass County Data Center Watch, against a proposed Tenaska natural gas power plant and data center campus said to involve Google, southeast of Omaha
- Forum
- Cass County Planning Commission, Cass County Board of Commissioners, and the Village of Nehawka board. No court filing as of September 3, 2026
- The project
- Tenaska announced on June 25, 2026 that it had optioned 1,354 acres in Cass County along Highway 75 south of Murray and Beaver Lake, for a proposed 2,000 acre natural gas power plant and data center in partnership with Google, per KETV
- Scale
- Flatwater Free Press reported in March 2026 that the proposed project would need 1,000 to 3,000 megawatts, more than the 800 megawatts Lincoln Electric System needs across its service area in summer, and could be online as soon as 2029
- County action
- Planning Commission approved a moratorium on Monday, July 13, 2026. The Board of Commissioners voted 5 to 0 on August 11, 2026 for a twelve month moratorium on data center permits, and tabled proposed data center regulations to September 22, per KLKN
- Village action
- On Wednesday, August 26, 2026 the Nehawka village board amended its zoning code to prohibit data centers in every zoning district, including substations, transformers, and generators. Effective fifteen days after passage, approval, and publication, per KETV
- Litigation
- None. No lawsuit has been filed by residents, the county, the village, or any developer
Key Takeaways
- Cass County residents stopped a hyperscale proposal at the permit counter, not in court. Tenaska announced on June 25, 2026 that it had optioned 1,354 acres along Highway 75 for a proposed natural gas plant and data center tied to Google. The county planning commission approved a moratorium on July 13, and the Board of Commissioners adopted a twelve month pause 5 to 0 on August 11, 2026.
- Two weeks later the village of Nehawka, a Cass County community of fewer than 200 people, went further: on August 26, 2026 its board amended the zoning code to prohibit data centers in every district, along with the substations, transformers, and generators that serve them.
- No lawsuit has been filed. That is what makes this entry useful. Nebraska's most effective data center fight so far has been a zoning fight, run through public hearings and county votes rather than a courtroom.
- The organizing was documentary. Cass County Data Center Watch, a residents' group, tracks public records on land option deals, and its stated goal going into the July 13 meeting was an eighteen month hold so the community could see specifications before anything was approved.
- The pressure was statewide, not local. Governor Jim Pillen signed Executive Order 26-17 on July 20, 2026, barring new data centers from ImagiNE Nebraska Act tax incentives and creating a seventeen member task force. By early September 2026, KLKN reported twelve Nebraska counties had approved temporary moratoriums.
- Nebraska law leaves the clocks short and the citizen suit open. An appeal from a county board of adjustment must be filed in district court within fifteen days under Neb. Rev. Stat. section 23-168.04, while section 84-1414 lets any citizen of the state sue to void a public body's action taken in violation of the Open Meetings Act if the suit is commenced within 120 days of the meeting.
In this article
No lawsuit has been filed over the data center campus proposed for Cass County, Nebraska, and residents there would tell you that is the win. On June 25, 2026, the energy developer Tenaska announced it had optioned 1,354 acres along Highway 75 south of Murray and Beaver Lake for a proposed 2,000 acre natural gas power plant and data center in partnership with Google. Within three weeks the county planning commission had approved a moratorium. On August 11, 2026, the Cass County Board of Commissioners voted 5 to 0 for a twelve month pause on data center permits and tabled its proposed regulations for further work. On August 26, the village of Nehawka, population under 200, banned data centers and their supporting infrastructure from every zoning district it has. This is the clearest example in the country right now of a community using ordinary land use process, on an ordinary timeline, to stop a hyperscale project cold. Here is what happened, what Nebraska law made possible, and what it leaves for the next county.
What was proposed, and how fast the county moved
The Cass County proposal is one piece of a much larger assembly. Flatwater Free Press reported in March 2026 that Tenaska had optioned more than 2,600 acres across southeast Nebraska since December, including at least 1,000 acres in Gage County, at least 450 acres in Lancaster County, at least 860 acres in Cass County, and nearly 300 acres in Otoe County. The reporting described a Google project that would require 1,000 to 3,000 megawatts of power, more than the 800 megawatts Lincoln Electric System needs across its entire service area in summer, and that documents indicated could be online as soon as 2029.
On June 25, 2026, Tenaska announced the Cass County piece: 1,354 acres along Highway 75 south of Murray and Beaver Lake, for a proposed 2,000 acre natural gas power plant and data center campus. KETV reported that many residents at the county planning commission's Monday, July 13 meeting raised concerns about how the project would be funded and what resources it would consume. The commission approved a moratorium that night.
Four weeks later, on August 11, 2026, the Cass County Board of Commissioners held a public hearing on both the moratorium and a set of proposed data center regulations. KLKN reported the board voted 5 to 0 for a twelve month moratorium on data center permits and tabled the proposed regulations until September 22 while it worked through community concerns. The pause and the rulemaking were deliberately separated: stop the clock first, write the rules second.
The village that went further
Nehawka is a Cass County village of fewer than 200 residents. KETV reported that its board had been fielding concerns as talk spread of land deals for a data center north of town, with the village board chairman saying residents were nervous the project would come to their doorstep. On Wednesday, August 26, 2026, after a special meeting considering recommendations from the village planning committee, the board amended the zoning code to ban data centers outright.
The ordinance is broader than most. It applies to every zoning district, and it prohibits data centers from being built, expanded, converted from existing buildings, or operated within the village. It also prohibits the related infrastructure that serves them, naming substations, transformers, and generators. Under the ordinance it takes effect fifteen days after passage, approval, and publication.
That last clause matters more than it looks. A ban that reaches substations and generators closes the workaround where the computing hall sits outside the jurisdiction but the electrical infrastructure that makes it possible sits inside. Communities writing their own ordinances should read that as a drafting lesson.
The residents' group, and what it actually did
Cass County Data Center Watch describes itself as a group of residents sharing information and encouraging public participation on proposed data center projects. Its practical work, as its founder described it to KETV, is tracking public records tied to land optioning deals. That is the whole method: find out what has been optioned, by whom, and where, before a rezoning application ever appears on an agenda.
The group's stated goal ahead of the July 13 planning commission meeting was an eighteen month hold, on the reasoning that there was not much information or many specifications available about what the project would actually look like, and that the community should see them before anything was approved. Members told KETV that family farmers were worried about water access, utility bills, low quality zoning, and what the project would mean for their land.
The county ultimately adopted twelve months rather than eighteen. That gap is worth noting honestly: organized residents did not get everything they asked for. They got the pause, the hearing, and a seat at the table for the regulations that follow.
The statewide pressure behind the local votes
Cass County did not act alone, and its commissioners were not the only Nebraska officials changing course in the summer of 2026.
- The executive order. On Monday, July 20, 2026, Governor Jim Pillen signed an executive order barring new data centers from receiving tax incentives under the ImagiNE Nebraska Act, and creating a state data center task force. KETV reported figures from the governor's office showing that between January 2021 and June 2026 Nebraska issued roughly $317 million in tax credits, direct refunds, and sales tax exemptions to data centers, and that data center projects saw $15 billion in personal property exempted, an estimated $519 million in property tax exemptions at a 2 percent rate.
- The task force. On August 19, 2026 the governor's office announced seventeen appointments to the task force created by Executive Order 26-17, charged with evaluating the industry's impact on Nebraska's water resources, power grids, and local infrastructure, and with making sure county officials have the tools, zoning guidelines, and policy frameworks to manage growth. Its membership includes the chief executives of the state's three largest public power utilities, a Sarpy County commissioner, and natural resources district managers. The first meeting was expected in September 2026.
- The county wave. KETV reported in July 2026 that twelve counties had imposed at least temporary moratoriums; KLKN reported the same count of twelve counties with approved temporary moratoriums in early September. Gage County supervisors approved an eight month moratorium on August 5, 2026 and held a hearing in early September on extending it to eighteen months. Otoe County suspended data center permits for up to a year in May 2026.
- The new statute. LB1010, signed April 14, 2026, requires data center owners and operators to report annual electricity demand and annual water usage to the Department of Water, Energy, and Environment each September 30, to bear decommissioning costs, and to enter into a community benefit agreement with affected communities.
What Nebraska law leaves for the next county
This section describes what the statutes say. It is not legal advice, and Nebraska counsel should confirm which provisions apply to any particular set of facts.
Board of adjustment appeals are extremely short. Neb. Rev. Stat. section 23-168.04 provides that a person aggrieved by a county board of adjustment decision may present a verified petition to the district court, and that "the petition must be presented to the court within fifteen days after the filing of the decision in the office of the board of adjustment." Section 19-912 sets the same fifteen day window for municipal boards of adjustment. Fifteen days is among the tightest zoning appeal windows in the country, and our guide to zoning appeal deadlines by state puts it beside other states' rules.
Conditional use decisions go to district court with a heavy burden. Under section 23-114.01(6), an appealing party "shall have the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence" that a conditional use or special exception decision was arbitrary, capricious, or illegal, or did not adhere to the county's zoning regulations. In counties other than the one containing a city of the primary class, that appeal is made to the district court. The statute does not set its own filing deadline; the Nebraska Supreme Court held in Preserve the Sandhills v. Cherry County that the general appeal procedure of section 25-1937 supplies it. Confirm the applicable deadline with counsel rather than assuming one.
The open meetings citizen suit is unusually generous. Section 84-1414(1) provides that formal action taken in violation of the Open Meetings Act "shall be declared void by the district court if the suit is commenced within one hundred twenty days of the meeting," and is voidable if commenced after 120 days but within one year. Subsection (3) provides that "any citizen of this state may commence a suit" to require compliance, prevent violations, or declare an action void. Nebraska does not route that power exclusively through prosecutors the way some states do.
Records come first. Section 84-712 gives residents and other interested persons the right to examine public records free of charge during business hours. That is the statute behind the land option tracking that Cass County residents used to see the project coming.
What this means for you
If a project is being assembled near you, in Nebraska or anywhere, the Cass County sequence is worth copying:
- Track the land, not the announcement. Option agreements and deed records show up long before a rezoning application. Section 84-712 makes the county records available to you at no charge.
- Ask for the pause first. A moratorium is the request a county board can grant without deciding the merits, and it buys the months in which real regulations get written.
- Write the ordinance broadly. Nehawka's ban reaches substations, transformers, and generators, not just the buildings full of servers.
- Get your objection into the record at the hearing. If a challenge ever becomes necessary, standing and preservation questions turn on whether you were heard at the administrative level.
- Document baseline conditions now. Well tests, sound readings, and dated photographs taken before construction are the evidence that makes a later claim provable. Our evidence guide covers the checklist.
Our guide to fighting a proposed data center walks through the approval process in more detail, and the Nebraska state page covers the wider footprint and the public power question. If a facility near you has moved past the proposal stage and is affecting your home, our free case review connects you with an independent attorney in our network handling data center matters in Nebraska, at no cost and with no obligation.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a lawsuit over the Cass County, Nebraska data center?
No. As of September 3, 2026, no lawsuit has been filed over the proposed Tenaska data center and power plant in Cass County. The dispute has been fought entirely through county and village land use process: a planning commission moratorium on July 13, 2026, a 5 to 0 county board vote for a twelve month moratorium on August 11, and a village zoning ban in Nehawka on August 26.
Did Cass County, Nebraska ban data centers?
The county adopted a twelve month moratorium on data center permits, not a ban, by a 5 to 0 vote on August 11, 2026, and tabled its proposed data center regulations until September 22. The village of Nehawka, inside Cass County, went further and amended its zoning code on August 26, 2026 to prohibit data centers and their substations, transformers, and generators in every zoning district.
What is the Tenaska data center project in Nebraska?
Tenaska announced on June 25, 2026 that it had optioned 1,354 acres in Cass County along Highway 75 south of Murray and Beaver Lake for a proposed 2,000 acre natural gas power plant and data center in partnership with Google, according to KETV. Flatwater Free Press reported in March 2026 that the broader project would require 1,000 to 3,000 megawatts and could be online as soon as 2029.
How many Nebraska counties have data center moratoriums?
KETV reported in July 2026 that twelve Nebraska counties had imposed at least temporary moratoriums on new data center development, and KLKN reported the same count of twelve counties with approved temporary moratoriums in early September 2026. Counties named in that reporting include Cass, Gage, and Otoe.
How long do Nebraska residents have to appeal a zoning decision?
Neb. Rev. Stat. section 23-168.04 requires a petition challenging a county board of adjustment decision to be presented to the district court within fifteen days after the decision is filed in the office of the board, and section 19-912 sets the same fifteen day window for municipal boards. Other kinds of land use decisions run on different tracks with different deadlines, so a Nebraska attorney should confirm which applies to your situation.
Article sources
Our editorial standards require primary sources: government publications, regulator data, company filings, and established industry research.
- 1.KETV: Cass County Planning Commission approves moratorium on data center development (July 13, 2026)
- 2.KLKN: Cass County Board of Commissioners unanimously vote for data center moratorium (August 11, 2026)
- 3.KETV: Village of Nehawka approves ban on data centers, related facilities (August 27, 2026)
- 4.KETV: Village of Nehawka considers zoning changes for community data centers (August 12, 2026)
- 5.KETV: Nehawka residents raise concerns over potential data center development (August 28, 2026)
- 6.Flatwater Free Press: Google proposes Nebraska data center requiring more power than all of Lincoln (March 13, 2026)
- 7.Flatwater Free Press: A Nebraska county just banned new data centers for up to a year. More could follow. (May 22, 2026)
- 8.KETV: Nebraska governor bars future tax incentives for data centers locating in state (July 20, 2026)
- 9.Office of Governor Jim Pillen: appointments to the newly created data center task force, Executive Order 26-17 (August 19, 2026)
- 10.KLKN: Gage County holds public hearing about possible moratorium on data centers (September 2026)
- 11.KLKN: Is an 18 month moratorium enough time to evaluate the impacts data centers are said to have? (September 2, 2026)
- 12.Neb. Rev. Stat. 23-168.04, appeal from a county board of adjustment, fifteen day petition window
- 13.Neb. Rev. Stat. 19-912, appeal from a municipal board of adjustment, fifteen day petition window
- 14.Neb. Rev. Stat. 23-114.01, county planning commission, conditional use permits, and appeals
- 15.Neb. Rev. Stat. 25-1937, general appeal procedure, cited in Preserve the Sandhills v. Cherry County
- 16.Neb. Rev. Stat. 84-1414, Open Meetings Act, void within 120 days and citizen suit
- 17.Neb. Rev. Stat. 84-712, public records, free examination
- 18.LB1010 (2026), Large Load Customer Regulation Act and data center reporting, approved by the Governor April 14, 2026
Related cases
- Project Helium in Barber County, Kansas: Google's Data Center Was Approved by Development Agreement, Not Zoning. Here Is What That Leaves Residents.
On August 31, 2026 the Barber County Commission approved Google's Project Helium by development agreement, 2 to 0 with one abstention, in a county with no zoning office. What the agreement promises, why the usual 30 day zoning challenge may not apply, and which clocks under Kansas open meetings law still run.
- City of Edgerton v. Its Own Residents: The Kansas Lawsuit to Kill a Citizen Data Center Ban
On August 14, 2026, the City of Edgerton, Kansas sued the residents behind a citizen petition that would ban high-impact data centers, asking a Johnson County judge to declare the petition void before it can reach a vote. The county had already verified the signatures. The city says the petition rests on false claims about water and power; the petitioners say the city is trying to stop a vote it might lose. A DAMAC data center is already moving into Logistics Park. What the case says about who gets to decide.
- Saline Township v. the $7 Billion Data Center: When the Developer Is the One Who Sues
Saline Township, Michigan denied rezoning for a $7 billion, 1.4 gigawatt OpenAI/Oracle data center campus in September 2025. Developer Related Digital and landowners sued the township for exclusionary zoning under the Michigan Constitution, and the township settled for roughly $14 million in community benefits. A resident's Open Meetings Act challenge to the settlement was denied in February 2026. The case is the clearest warning that developers sue too.
- The Stokes County Project Delta Lawsuit: 1,845 Acres on the Dan River, a 3 to 2 Vote, and a Burial Ground
On March 12, 2026, seven Stokes County families and four organizations, including the National Hairston Clan and the Dan River Basin Association, sued the Stokes County Board of Commissioners over its January 2026 vote to rezone roughly 1,845 acres of residential-agricultural land on the Dan River for the Project Delta hyperscale data center, overriding the Planning Board. The suit, brought by the Southern Coalition for Social Justice and the Southern Environmental Law Center, alleges defective notice, no factual basis, and no assessment of noise, air, water, or the Saura and Hairston sites on the land.
Is a data center disrupting your home?
Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.
- Free case review
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us