Sue Data Centers

Data Center Registry

PORTS-Pike Technology Campus

Piketon, Pike County, Ohio

Under constructionMixed receptionRecord updated September 1, 2026

PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is a data center under construction in Piketon, Ohio (Pike County), operated by SB Energy. The public record puts it at 10 GW planned. It has documented support and documented opposition on record.

Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.

Facility record

Under construction

Operator
SB Energy
Facility type
Data center
Location
Piketon, Pike County, OH
Coordinates
39.0600, -83.0200 (approximate)
Power capacity
10 GW planned
Land
Not established from a public source
Investment
Not established from a public source
Announced
Not established from a public source
Utility
AEP Ohio
Power source
Mixed
On site generation
9.2 GW
Cooling
Not established from a public source
Water use
Not established from a public source
Jobs
2,000 permanent; 10,000 construction
Public subsidy
Not established from a public source
Community reception
Mixed reception
Source confidence
Confirmed by multiple independent sources or official documentation

Timeline from the record

Newest first. Record entries come from the filings and reports the registry cites. Coverage entries are headlines from publisher feeds we monitor daily, linked to the outlet; last checked September 14, 2026.

  1. March 20, 2026
    Under construction
    Groundbreaking 2026-03-20 on the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant site; 10 GW gross power load, 9.2 GW of new natural gas generation. Source: Construction Review Online

Opposition and litigation at this site

Partly. Both documented support and documented opposition to PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Piketon, Pike County, Ohio appear in the record, with no clear majority position. Documented local support alongside contamination-legacy distrust.

How the community has taken it

Reception is a sourced signal, not an editorial judgment: mixed reception means documented support and documented opposition both exist with no clear majority position on record.

Documented local support alongside contamination-legacy distrust. Support: State Sen. Shane Wilkin - "It’s just going to be a generational change for this area"; SODI executive director Steve Shepherd called it "a model for the country"; the Scioto Valley-Piketon Area Council of Governments chair framed it as moving contaminated residential land to industrial use. Concern: a neighbouring farmer with contaminated property ("This is the most contaminated place around here"), and Conserve Ohio on water, transmission and the precedent of siting hyperscale projects on legacy DOE land. No litigation, moratorium or public-hearing defeat found as of 2026-09-01; a statewide watchdog notes this project lacks the named opposition groups seen elsewhere in Ohio. Community money (not a public subsidy to the operator): a $40M Community Benefits Agreement from SB Energy plus an incremental $40M from OpenAI.

Source: Statehouse News Bureau

Power and water

S-1: the campus is "designed to include 8.0 GW-IT of data center capacity, representing 10 GW of gross power load expected to be supported by the PJM transmission system and new neighbouring gas-fired generation facilities" - hence "mixed". The 9.2 GW of gas is new build, not a reused plant; the site is the former Portsmouth uranium-enrichment complex, whose historic power came over OVEC coal-fired transmission (X-533 switchyard, de-energised 2008, decommissioned 2011). Recorded under onSiteGenerationMw as dedicated captive generation, but note the S-1 calls the plants "neighbouring": they sit ~5 miles south of Piketon adjacent to the DOE site, are developed by "an affiliate of SoftBank that is not our subsidiary", and SB Energy "do[es] not expect to own or operate" them. Ohio Power Siting Board case 26-0746-EL-BGN (applicant Portsmouth Gas DevCo, LLC) covers only a first tranche of "up to 2 gigawatts"; AEP Ohio transmission (new 765 kV Baku-Gavin line and four substations) is a separate docket. AEP grid capex is stated as $4.2B by DOE and ~$5.1B in the S-1, unreconciled. CAUTION: the project site states the gas generation "will be owned by the U.S. Government", but the S-1 says "no binding agreement has been executed between us or any of our affiliates and any governmental entity with respect to the funding, construction, ownership or operation of the generation facilities" - do not assert federal ownership. Only ~0.8 GW of gross load has contracted utility service so far.

Notes on the record

Officially "PORTS-Pike Technology Campus"; formerly tracked under the pre-announcement Ohio entity New Day Data Centers LLC, a name that appears nowhere in the SEC S-1 or SB Energy’s own announcements. Developer/operator is SB Energy (SoftBank-controlled); the DOE lease was signed 2026-02-26 by its subsidiary Pike County Portsmouth DC LLC. CAPACITY - three distinct figures that must not be conflated: 8.0 GW-IT of contracted compute (8,024 MW-IT; NVIDIA guarantees the initial 4.25 GW-IT with an option on the remaining 3.78 GW-IT), 10 GW of gross power load (the capacityMw.planned value here), and 9.2 GW of new gas generation. OFFTAKE: on 2026-08-17 SB Energy subsidiaries signed 17 twenty-year triple-net leases with OpenAI, with rent commencement conditioned on interconnection and generation being available; NVIDIA provided a residual-value guaranty capped at $105B and separately bought $1.5B of non-voting stock. LAND: landAcres is intentionally omitted - the DOE lease covers 189 acres (Batch 1) on which "one data center building is expected to be constructed", while the S-1 places the buildings "across several thousand acres of private property"; the widely-cited 3,700/3,777 acres is the whole federal reservation, which also hosts the separately tracked Oklo Aurora project, Centrus and the DUF6 plant. INVESTMENT: investmentUsd intentionally omitted - $10B (DOE, March) and $30-40B (project site) describe the same ~800 MW first phase and cannot both be right, the $67.2B total appears only as one trade outlet’s unattributed rollup, and the S-1 states no total capex. SUBSIDIES: none awarded - the Ohio Tax Credit Authority minutes record no award, no JobsOhio award was found, and Ohio paused new data-centre tax exemptions in May 2026; a county PILOT is under negotiation because the leased federal land yields no property tax. STATUS: early civil works began after the 2026-03-20 groundbreaking, though the S-1 lists construction as not started, with first capacity in 2028 and full buildout 2032. Distinct from oklo-aurora-pike-county-oh on the same broader site - do not merge or double-count.

What the record does not establish, and the document that would

In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.

  • Cooling method and water use
  • Tax abatements or other public subsidy
  • Land area
Which document closes each gap
Cooling method and water use
The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
Tax abatements or other public subsidy
The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
Land area
The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.

Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.

Other sites within 30 miles

Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.

Questions people ask about this site

Is there opposition to the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Piketon?

Partly. Both documented support and documented opposition to PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Piketon, Pike County, Ohio appear in the record, with no clear majority position. Documented local support alongside contamination-legacy distrust.

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus?

No lawsuit over PORTS-Pike Technology Campus appears in the record we track as of September 1, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.

How much water does PORTS-Pike Technology Campus use?

No water withdrawal figure for PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.

Who operates PORTS-Pike Technology Campus, and how big is it?

SB Energy is the operator on record. Capacity on record is 10 GW.

How to cite this page

SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "PORTS-Pike Technology Campus," updated September 1, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/new-day-ports-technology-campus-piketon-oh.

Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/new-day-ports-technology-campus-piketon-oh, retrieved September 14, 2026.

Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Sources for this record

As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.

  1. 1.$67.2B PORTS Technology Campus gains FAST-41 status, advancing Ohio AI megaproject · Construction Review Online · retrieved July 17, 2026
  2. 2.Piketon set to become ground zero for new energy megasite · Scioto Valley Guardian · retrieved July 17, 2026
  3. 3.SB Energy, Inc. Form S-1 registration statement (PORTS-Pike Technology Campus) · SEC EDGAR · retrieved September 1, 2026
  4. 4.CX-270875: Lease of Real Property (Batch 1 Property) at Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant · U.S. Department of Energy (NEPA) · retrieved September 1, 2026
  5. 5.CX-270956: Environmental Site Assessment of Batch 1 Leased Property at Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant · U.S. Department of Energy (NEPA) · retrieved September 1, 2026
  6. 6.FACT SHEET: DOE is Ensuring Affordable Energy Access in Ohio While Powering the Future of AI · U.S. Department of Energy · retrieved September 1, 2026
  7. 7.Partnership Ensures Affordable Energy, Powers AI Future at Portsmouth Site · U.S. DOE Office of Environmental Management · retrieved September 1, 2026
  8. 8.PORTS Technology Campus is Latest to Gain FAST-41 Coverage · Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council · retrieved September 1, 2026
  9. 9.NVIDIA Guarantees SB Energy's PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Ohio to Exclusively Host NVIDIA AI Compute · NVIDIA · retrieved September 1, 2026
  10. 10.PORTS-Pike Technology Campus, project resources · PORTS-Pike Technology Campus (project site) · retrieved September 1, 2026
  11. 11.Feds announce huge natural gas plant, data center project in southern Ohio · Statehouse News Bureau · retrieved September 1, 2026
  12. 12.A data center proposed at site of former uranium enrichment plant near Piketon · WOUB Public Media · retrieved September 1, 2026

Is a data center disrupting your home?

Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.

  • Free case review
  • Independent attorneys
  • No obligation

Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us