Data Center Registry
Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers
Lockhart, Union County, South Carolina · All 2 Genesis Digital Assets sites
Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers is an operating crypto mining site in Lockhart, South Carolina (Union County), operated by Genesis Digital Assets. The public record puts it at 15 MW operating.
Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.
Facility record
Operating
- Operator
- Genesis Digital Assets
- Facility type
- Crypto mining
- Location
- Lockhart, Union County, SC
- Coordinates
- 34.7865, -81.4620 (representative_multi_site)
- Power capacity
- 15 MW operating
- Land
- Not established from a public source
- Investment
- Not established from a public source
- Announced
- Not established from a public source
- Utility
- Not established from a public source
- Cooling
- Not established from a public source
- Water use
- Not established from a public source
- Jobs
- Not established from a public source
- Public subsidy
- Not established from a public source
- Community reception
- No reception on record
- Source confidence
- Reported by at least one credible outlet or filing
Timeline from the record
Newest first. Record entries come from the filings and reports the registry cites. Coverage entries are headlines from publisher feeds we monitor daily, linked to the outlet; last checked September 14, 2026.
- March 2023OperatingThe two Union/Lockhart facilities began operating in March 2023 with 15 MW of combined capacity; 95% of contracted construction workers were South Carolina residents. Source: SC Biz News
Opposition and litigation at this site
Nothing on record as of September 10, 2026. No lawsuit, organized opposition, or contested hearing over Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers in Lockhart, Union County, South Carolina appears in the sources this registry tracks. That is an absence in our sources rather than a finding that none exists, and local opposition often predates any coverage a national dataset would pick up.
If you live near this site and something is happening that this page does not show, that is worth telling us. Send us the document and it goes in the record with the source attached. For sites where opposition is already established, see every contested site we track.
Power and water
Reporting states the Pacolet center sits about three miles from two hydroelectric generation plants operated by Lockhart Power.
Notes on the record
Deliberately recorded as one multi-site record rather than two, because the source gives only a combined 15 MW figure and locates both facilities as 'between Union and Lockhart' with no addresses; splitting them would require inventing per-site capacity. Coordinates are the Lockhart, SC centroid and are illustrative only. Re-checked 2026-09-10: no status change found, and no new fillable field secured -- absence-of-adverse-signal only, not an independent confirmation of continued operation. The facility's cited source (scbiz.com, re-fetched today) remains the most recent primary account: two facilities between Union and Lockhart, combined 15MW, running since March 2023, sited near two Lockhart Power hydroelectric plants. I independently confirmed Lockhart Power Company is a real, currently-operating utility (hydro + solar generation, active economic-development program as of a fetch today) -- consistent with, but not independent confirmation of, the 2023 account. I could NOT locate Union County SC's own official government website this session (unioncountysc.org 301-redirects to an unrelated education-grant site, gearupunionsc.com; unioncountysc.gov/.com do not resolve; a South Carolina Association of Counties lookup 404'd), so no county-council-minutes or FILOT-ordinance check was possible for Union County specifically (unlike the parallel Anderson County check I was able to do for the sibling record). Also could NOT check SC PSC dockets or FERC eLibrary (both JS-only SPAs, no content via static fetch) or run a general web search (WebSearch quota exhausted before I started this session; DuckDuckGo/Bing/Marginalia direct fetches all hit CAPTCHA/anomaly-detection walls; web.archive.org was reporting 'Temporarily Offline'). investmentUsd, landAcres, water, location.street/postalCode, subsidies, and aiClassification remain unresolved for these tooling reasons, not as a confirmed absence. As with the Anderson record, the source's '150 jobs / 125 local contractors' figure is an explicit COMBINED total across all three GDA South Carolina sites (Anderson + the two Union/Lockhart facilities) with no per-site split given, so `jobs` is deliberately not filled here either -- filling it would double-count against the Anderson record. `community` is not filled for the same reason as the sibling record: the only reception language present is GDA's own press-release self-description, not documented independent public reception.
What the record does not establish, and the document that would
In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.
- Cooling method and water use
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- Permanent jobs promised
- Land area
- How the community has received it
- Which utility serves it
Which document closes each gap
- Cooling method and water use
- The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
- Permanent jobs promised
- The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
- Land area
- The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.
- How the community has received it
- Planning commission and governing body minutes, public comment records, and any petition or lawsuit filed in the county.
- Which utility serves it
- The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.
Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.
Other sites within 30 miles
Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.
- Project Alpaca (Midway Green Industrial Park) · Union · Volt Edge Energy13 mi · Proposed · 49 MW · Contested
- Cielo Digital Infrastructure Gaffney Campus · Gaffney · Cielo Digital Infrastructure, LLC20 mi · Proposed · 300 MW
- NorthMark Strategies Spartanburg High-Performance Computing Center · Spartanburg · Valara Holdings (NorthMark Strategies)24 mi · Under construction · 450 MW
- QTS York County Data Center Campus · QTS Data Centers25 mi · Under construction
- Greenidge Spartanburg (South Carolina) · Spartanburg · Greenidge Generation29 mi · Cancelled · 100 MW
Questions people ask about this site
Is there opposition to the Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers data center in Lockhart?
Nothing on record as of September 10, 2026. No lawsuit, organized opposition, or contested hearing over Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers in Lockhart, Union County, South Carolina appears in the sources this registry tracks. That is an absence in our sources rather than a finding that none exists, and local opposition often predates any coverage a national dataset would pick up.
Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers data center?
No lawsuit over Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers appears in the record we track as of September 10, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.
How much water does Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers use?
No water withdrawal figure for Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.
Who operates Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers, and how big is it?
Genesis Digital Assets is the operator on record. We hold 2 sites for that company across the registry. Capacity on record is 15 MW.
How to cite this page
SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Genesis Digital Assets Union-Lockhart Bitcoin Mining Data Centers," updated September 10, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/genesis-digital-assets-union-lockhart-sc.
Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/genesis-digital-assets-union-lockhart-sc, retrieved September 14, 2026.
Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Sources for this record
As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.
- 1.Bitcoin miner opens three data centers in Anderson, Union counties · SC Biz News · retrieved August 26, 2026
- 2.OpenStreetMap Nominatim geocode for Lockhart, Union County, SC · OpenStreetMap · retrieved August 26, 2026
Is a data center disrupting your home?
Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.
- Free case review
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us