Sue Data Centers

Data Center Registry

Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152)

Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio · All 8 Expedient sites

OperatingNo reception on recordRecord updated August 5, 2026

Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) is an operating data center in Garfield Heights, Ohio (Cuyahoga County), operated by Expedient.

Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.

Facility record

Operating

Operator
Expedient
Facility type
Data center
Location
Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, OH
Coordinates
41.4280, -81.5733
Power capacity
Not established from a public source
Land
Not established from a public source
Investment
Not established from a public source
Announced
Not established from a public source
Utility
Not established from a public source
Cooling
Not established from a public source
Water use
Not established from a public source
Jobs
Not established from a public source
Public subsidy
Not established from a public source
Community reception
No reception on record
Source confidence
Confirmed by multiple independent sources or official documentation

Opposition and litigation at this site

Nothing on record as of August 5, 2026. No lawsuit, organized opposition, or contested hearing over Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) in Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio appears in the sources this registry tracks. That is an absence in our sources rather than a finding that none exists, and local opposition often predates any coverage a national dataset would pick up.

If you live near this site and something is happening that this page does not show, that is worth telling us. Send us the document and it goes in the record with the source attached. For sites where opposition is already established, see every contested site we track.

Notes on the record

Two-building Expedient colocation campus at 15166 and 15248 Neo Parkway in Garfield Heights (Cleveland market), operating since ~2015. No clean total critical-IT-load MW figure is published (only backup-generator sizing), so capacity is omitted. Distinct from the tracked Lumen/Ark-Involta/T5 Cuyahoga sites.

What the record does not establish, and the document that would

In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.

  • Power capacity in megawatts
  • Cooling method and water use
  • Tax abatements or other public subsidy
  • Permanent jobs promised
  • Land area
  • How the community has received it
  • Which utility serves it
Which document closes each gap
Power capacity in megawatts
The utility's large load service agreement, the interconnection request in the grid operator's queue, or the electrical site plan in the permit file.
Cooling method and water use
The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
Tax abatements or other public subsidy
The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
Permanent jobs promised
The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
Land area
The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.
How the community has received it
Planning commission and governing body minutes, public comment records, and any petition or lawsuit filed in the county.
Which utility serves it
The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.

Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.

Other sites within 30 miles

Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.

Questions people ask about this site

Is there opposition to the Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) data center in Garfield Heights?

Nothing on record as of August 5, 2026. No lawsuit, organized opposition, or contested hearing over Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) in Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio appears in the sources this registry tracks. That is an absence in our sources rather than a finding that none exists, and local opposition often predates any coverage a national dataset would pick up.

Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) data center?

No lawsuit over Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) appears in the record we track as of August 5, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.

How much water does Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) use?

No water withdrawal figure for Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152) is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.

Who operates Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152), and how big is it?

Expedient is the operator on record. We hold 8 sites for that company across the registry. No capacity figure is on record for this site.

How to cite this page

SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "Expedient Cleveland (NEO 151 / NEO 152)," updated August 5, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/expedient-cleveland-neo-oh.

Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.32.0 (September 7, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/expedient-cleveland-neo-oh, retrieved September 14, 2026.

Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.

Sources for this record

As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.

  1. 1.NEO 151 facility page: 15166 Neo Parkway, 24,000+ sq ft, 900 kVA UPS, dual 2.5 MW generators, 600 tons cooling · cloudandcolocation.com · retrieved August 5, 2026
  2. 2.Data Center Knowledge: Expedient completes third Cleveland-market data center · Data Center Knowledge · retrieved August 5, 2026

Is a data center disrupting your home?

Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.

  • Free case review
  • Independent attorneys
  • No obligation
Get my free case reviewDo I even have a case?

Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us