Data Center Registry
La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud
Saint Cloud, Osceola County, Florida
La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud is a proposed data center in Saint Cloud, Florida (Osceola County), operated by La Rosa Holdings Corp. The public record puts it at announced February 5, 2026, 1.5 MW planned.
Every line on this page traces to a public source listed at the bottom. Where a figure was looked for and not found, the row says so. A blank is never a zero.
Facility record
Proposed
- Operator
- La Rosa Holdings Corp.
- Facility type
- Data center
- Location
- 2570 AmeraTrails Lot 6D, Saint Cloud, Osceola County, FL, 34772
- Coordinates
- 28.1896, -81.2784 (approximate)
- Power capacity
- 1.5 MW planned
- Land
- Not established from a public source
- Investment
- Not established from a public source
- Announced
- February 5, 2026
- Utility
- Not established from a public source
- Cooling
- Not established from a public source
- Water use
- Not established from a public source
- Jobs
- Not established from a public source
- Public subsidy
- Not established from a public source
- Community reception
- No reception on record
- Source confidence
- Confirmed by multiple independent sources or official documentation
Timeline from the record
Newest first. Record entries come from the filings and reports the registry cites. Coverage entries are headlines from publisher feeds we monitor daily, linked to the outlet; last checked September 14, 2026.
- February 5, 2026ProposedLa Rosa Holdings signed a contract on 4 February 2026 to acquire the development site and announced plans for a Tier III AI data center of up to 10,000 sq ft supporting an estimated 1,500 kW IT load. Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR)
Opposition and litigation at this site
Nothing on record as of September 14, 2026. No lawsuit, organized opposition, or contested hearing over La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud in Saint Cloud, Osceola County, Florida appears in the sources this registry tracks. That is an absence in our sources rather than a finding that none exists, and local opposition often predates any coverage a national dataset would pick up.
If you live near this site and something is happening that this page does not show, that is worth telling us. Send us the document and it goes in the record with the source attached. For sites where opposition is already established, see every contested site we track.
Notes on the record
Small enterprise/AI facility: up to 10,000 sq ft at Tier III with roughly 1.5 MW of IT load. The transaction is conditional, the company's own filing states there can be no assurance the acquisition is consummated, and it carried a 75-day due diligence exit. The $675,000 in the 8-K is the land purchase price, not a facility investment, so investmentUsd is deliberately omitted.
What the record does not establish, and the document that would
In every fight on our tracker the decisive fact came out of a public records request. These are the requests for this site.
- Cooling method and water use
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- Permanent jobs promised
- Land area
- How the community has received it
- Which utility serves it
Which document closes each gap
- Cooling method and water use
- The water service agreement, any groundwater appropriation permit, and the mechanical narrative in the site plan.
- Tax abatements or other public subsidy
- The abatement, PILOT, or development agreement approved by the county, city, or development authority, and the state's data center sales tax exemption certificate if one was issued.
- Permanent jobs promised
- The economic development application or incentive agreement, which usually states a job commitment and a clawback.
- Land area
- The rezoning application, the plat, or the deed recorded with the county.
- How the community has received it
- Planning commission and governing body minutes, public comment records, and any petition or lawsuit filed in the county.
- Which utility serves it
- The electric service agreement or the utility's filing with the state public utility commission.
Have one of these documents? Send it to us and we will add it to the record with attribution.
Other sites within 30 miles
Distances are between recorded coordinates, many of which are a city or county centroid, so treat them as approximate. Cumulative load on one utility and one aquifer is the question a planning commission rarely asks.
- CoreSite OR1, Orlando · Orlando · CoreSite19 mi · Operating
- Cielo Haines City Data Center · Haines City · Cielo Digital Infrastructure21 mi · Proposed · 300 MW · Contested
- HostDime Orlando Tier IV Data Center · Eatonville · HostDime30 mi · Under construction · Contested
Questions people ask about this site
Is there opposition to the La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud in Saint Cloud?
Nothing on record as of September 14, 2026. No lawsuit, organized opposition, or contested hearing over La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud in Saint Cloud, Osceola County, Florida appears in the sources this registry tracks. That is an absence in our sources rather than a finding that none exists, and local opposition often predates any coverage a national dataset would pick up.
Has anyone filed a lawsuit over the La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud?
No lawsuit over La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud appears in the record we track as of September 14, 2026. Residents most often reach a lawyer over water supply, well drawdown, noise from cooling plant, property value, or a rezoning approved without the notice the ordinance required. If any of that is happening near this site, it is worth a review whether or not a case has been filed yet.
How much water does La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud use?
No water withdrawal figure for La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud is on record here. Water use is rarely published voluntarily; it usually surfaces through a utility service agreement or a state withdrawal permit, both of which are public records. We leave the number blank rather than estimate one.
Who operates La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud, and how big is it?
La Rosa Holdings Corp. is the operator on record. Capacity on record is 1.5 MW.
How to cite this page
SueDataCenters.org Data Center Registry, "La Rosa Holdings Tier III AI Data Center, St. Cloud," updated September 14, 2026, https://suedatacenters.org/data-centers/la-rosa-holdings-saint-cloud-fl.
Facility data from Compute Atlas (E. Kubiak), version 1.34.0 (September 21, 2026), licensed CC BY 4.0, record https://www.compute-atlas.com/facilities/la-rosa-holdings-saint-cloud-fl, retrieved October 1, 2026.
Corrections with a public source are welcome at the Compute Atlas record or through our contact page. The whole registry is available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0.
Sources for this record
As compiled and cited by Compute Atlas, with our own reporting appended. Archived links are used where the original has moved.
- 1.La Rosa Holdings Corp. Form 8-K (filed 6 February 2026), contract to purchase 2570 AmeraTrails Lot 6D, Saint Cloud FL 34772 for $675,000 with a 75-day due diligence period; closing set for 15 June 2026; intent to develop a Tier III AI data center · U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR) · retrieved September 14, 2026
- 2.La Rosa Holdings Corp. press release, 5 February 2026, up to 10,000 sq ft Tier III AI data center in Osceola County supporting an estimated IT load of ~1,500 kW · GlobeNewswire / La Rosa Holdings Corp. · retrieved September 14, 2026
- 3.OpenStreetMap Nominatim, ZIP 34772, Saint Cloud, Osceola County, Florida → 28.1896418, -81.2783896 · OpenStreetMap contributors · retrieved September 14, 2026
Is a data center disrupting your home?
Tell us what is happening. We will connect you with an independent attorney who handles data center cases in your state, free and with no obligation. These cases are commonly taken on contingency, so there are typically no upfront fees.
- Free case review
- Independent attorneys
- No obligation
Attorney or law firm handling data center matters? Speak with us